Mardean
Isaac explains who the Assyrians are and gives us his perspective on the debate
over Arab/Assyrian identity of Middle Eastern Christians. This is a full transcript* of the first part of an interview. The second part, on the possible creation of an Assyrian homeland, can be found here.
Mardean Isaac ajuda-nos a perceber quem são os
Assírios e dá-nos a sua perspectiva sobre o debate acerca da identidade dos
cristãos no Médio Oriente. Transcrição completa da primeira parte de uma entrevista, cuja continuação, sobre a eventual criação de um território para os assírios, está aqui.
Where were you born?
I
was born in England. My father is an Iraqi Assyrian and my mother is an Iranian
Assyrian.
Assyrian, what exactly does that
term mean?
The
term refers to an ethnic group who inhabit a contiguous region which is roughly
correspondent to what is now described as Kurdistan, so South-east Turkey,
North-East Syria, North-West Iraq, the Urmia region of Iran, and we are a
non-Arab, non-Kurdish people, we speak colloquial dialects of Aramaic with some
native morphology, even though our liturgical and ecclesiastical dialects are
middle-Aramaic/Classical Syriac, we speak vernacular versions of those.
We
have existed in those settings as a community for hundreds if not thousands of
years.
Assyrian
is a term we use to describe ourselves because we trace our ancestry and
heritage to the inhabitants of that ancient civilization and we continue to
inhabit many of its territories.
Are Assyrians Christians?
Yes.
That is to say that they are almost entirely a Christian people -- I am not
speaking to their particular beliefs, i.e. whether they are practicing or not.
There are ethnic Assyrians who have converted to Islam over the centuries and
have lost their identity and language. In recent memory, there are Assyrians
who were forcibly converted to Islam and/or 'Kurdified' during the Assyrian
genocide of the early 20th century. There is also a small number of Jewish
Assyrians.
When we speak of Assyrians, we are
not speaking of all Christians in the Middle East... Would Assyrians include
the Chaldeans for example?
The
Chaldean church is a Catholic branch of what is now called the Assyrian Church
of the East. The first Church of the East Patriarch to enter communion with
Rome was Yohannan Sulaqa in 1552. The Chaldean Church became a 'millet' of the
Ottoman Empire in 1846. Chaldeans are Catholic, but ethnically Assyrian.
How about the maronites, for
example?
The
Maronites are obviously a Levantine people. Historically they have used Syriac,
our classical language, but ethnically it depends what you mean. They belong to
a different region, but it is tricky because many of them refer to themselves
as Surayeh, which is hard to translate directly, but translates into Syriac --
or Syrian, in a non-Arab sense. So I would say there is a link in terms of a
Syriac heritage, as well as a culture of martial highland resistance, but
ethnically, directly, they are not the same as us, no.
I know that the term Assyrian is not
necessarily embraced in the Middle East, there are many who are attached to an
Arab identity. How peaceful is the term in characterizing Christians in the
Middle East?
I
think the Maronites have a very special place in the political history of the
Middle East, especially in the XXth Century, that is to say, at the time of the
Lebanese independence they were around 40 or 50% of the population. They
spearheaded the independence movement, so their adoption of the Arab identity
was the closest you could say to a majoritarian adoption of that identity. They
chose to do it for the sake of the country, so to say, they wanted to align
themselves with the countries nearby them and so on.
Iraqi Christian displaced by Islamic State |
They
don't call themselves Assyrian and over time, especially with the failure of
our own national movement, which collapsed when the Ottoman Turks massacred us
in 1915-1918, with the collapse of that movement the churches started to
entrench themselves and try and enforce their own authority over their
communities and distance themselves from a national identity.
I
call myself Assyrian, I have many Chaldeans in my family who also call
themselves Assyrian, we all speak Suret, which is a dialect of Aramaic with
Akkadian elements, which we usually refer to in English as Assyrian, and I know
countless members of the Syriac Orthodox Church also refer to themselves as
Assyrian.
The Patriarch of the Melkite church,
for example, is very emphatic about the Christians being Arabs just like their
neighbours. Is that also a leftover of the Arab Nationalist movement?
Absolutely.
The division, broadly, is between people who want to assert themselves
independently of Arabism, and independent of the dominant hegemonic forces in
the region, which are and were Arabism and more recently Islam. So when it
comes to the Melkite Church, increasingly it is true of the Chaldean Church,
this was true of the Maronite Church, although Maronite political parties have
more recently begun to move away from an Arab identity, and during the Lebanese
Civil War many groups, though ostensibly Catholic, refused to identify as
Arabs. It has to do with whether the leaders of the churches feel they have to
prioritize their congregation and their ecclesiastical authority on the Arab
dominion, or whether they side with their people, in other words, they try and
move towards a situation where they establish themselves quasi-independently.
Our
Patriarch of the Church of the East wanted to establish an Assyrian State,
under the auspices of the British, so that division between Arab and Non-Arab,
has to do with that. But of course, when they describe themselves as Arabs it
goes without saying that they are not "real" Arabs. They are not the
Arabs of the Gulf, they don't belong to Arab tribes. The Arabism is a political
movement which began in the Early XXth Century and under whose auspices they
wish to go in order to save their own church and find a place for their
religion in an Arab world.
During the Arab Nationalist
movement, many Christians saw this as an opportunity and thought this was a
chance to fit in and play leading roles, and many did. But with the failure of
the Arab Nationalist movement, in practical terms, could it make it worse if
they identify as non-Arabs?
It’s
an odd situation. In the case of ISIS there is not a trace of Arabism in them.
It’s a kind of bizarre international murder gang of Chechen and Welsh
teenagers, and Afghans and all kinds of people. Of course they are preoccupied
in a bizarre manner with what they call original Islam, but overall in terms of
the discussions I have with Middle Eastern people my age, they find the ethnic
aspect of Assyrians utterly baffling. They may discover with surprise that we
don't speak Arabic, but broadly they simply see us as Christians and
increasingly they see each other as simply Shiite or Sunni rather than
primarily as Arabs.
Of
course there are all kinds of tribal, geographical, local forces at work in all
of these conflicts, but the area of broad ethnic identification is certainly in
decline. And the regimes that supported that identification are collapsing.
*A few corrections and minor alterations were submitted to these answers by Mardean Isaac in November 2014. I accepted these as they made no change to the overall tone or message of the original interview, and improved its clarity in some ways. In some cases they were spelling corrections to terms I had misheard during the interview.
*A few corrections and minor alterations were submitted to these answers by Mardean Isaac in November 2014. I accepted these as they made no change to the overall tone or message of the original interview, and improved its clarity in some ways. In some cases they were spelling corrections to terms I had misheard during the interview.
No comments:
Post a Comment